Posner responds to "Why Mickey Mouse is Not Subject to Congestion," by Michele Boldrin and David Levine

Richard A. Posner, University of Chicago

Download Tell a Colleague Print Submit a letter about this article

Summary

The question is whether it is possible to have a congestion externality in intellectual property, such as the Mickey Mouse character. Literally, the answer is no. Figuratively, it is yes.

Recommended Citation

Posner, Richard A. (2004) "Posner responds to "Why Mickey Mouse is Not Subject to Congestion," by Michele Boldrin and David Levine," The Economists' Voice: Vol. 1 : Iss. 2, Article 5.
Available at: http://www.bepress.com/ev/vol1/iss2/art5

 
 
 

ISSN: 1553-3832 ©1999-2008 The Berkeley Electronic Press™ All rights reserved.

To submit, subscribe, recommend this journal to your library, or sign up for email alerts, please visit: http://www.bepress.com/ev