Causal Inference in Epidemiological Studies with Strong Confounding
Download the Paper Forward to a colleague
Abstract:
One of the identifiabilty assumptions of causal effects defined by marginal structural model (MSM) parameters is the experimental treatment assignment (ETA) assumption. Practical violations of this assumption frequently occur in data analysis, when certain exposures are rarely observed within some strata of the population. The inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) estimator is particularly sensitive to violations of this assumption, however, we demonstrate that this is a problem for all estimators of causal effects. This is due to the fact that the ETA assumption is about information (or lack thereof) in the data. A new class of causal models, causal models for realistic individualized exposure rules (CMRIER), introduced in van der Laan and Petersen (2007), is based on dynamic interventions. CMRIER generalize MSM, and their parameters remain fully identifiable from the observed data, even when the ETA assumption is violated, if the dynamic interventions are set to be realistic. Examples of such realistic interventions are provided. We argue that causal effects defined by CMRIER may be more appropriate in many situations, particularly those with policy considerations. Through simulation studies, we examine the performance of the IPTW estimator of the CMRIER parameters in contrast to that of the MSM parameters. We also apply the methodology to a real data analysis in air pollution epidemiology to illustrate the interpretation of the causal effects defined by CMRIER.
Subject Area:
Epidemiology, Statistical Models
Suggested Citation:
Kelly L. Moore, Romain S. Neugebauer, Mark J. van der Laan, and Ira B. Tager, "Causal Inference in Epidemiological Studies with Strong Confounding" (October 2009). U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 255.
http://www.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper255