Abstract

According to the traditional view, preventive uses of force between states and preventive killings of individuals, to be legal, have one basic requirement in common, namely, the requirement of the immediacy of the threat posed. The U.S. National Security Strategy of September 2002, the so-called Bush doctrine, and the so-called Israeli policy of "targeted killing" challenge precisely this core requirement for the preventive use of force against states and against individuals. The author argues that abandonment of the traditional standard is unwarranted, even when taking into account the new kinds of threats that have arisen in recent times. Such abandonment, he argues, would risk transforming indispensable foundations of the international law on the use of force and on human rights.

Recommended Citation

Nolte, Georg (2004) "Preventive Use of Force and Preventive Killings: Moves into a Different Legal Order," Theoretical Inquiries in Law: Vol. 5 : No. 1, Article 4.
Available at: http://www.bepress.com/til/default/vol5/iss1/art4