Questions of Human Enhancement

As advances in medicine and the life-sciences continue offer the opportunity to “enhance” humans and other species, it becomes clear that the discussion of human enhancement raises questions in philosophy, religion, science, medicine, sociology, history, law, and many other disciplines. From a balanced and interdisciplinary position, this thematic issue seeks to address some of these concerns and questions that are faced by policy makers and practitioners alike, including:

What constitutes enhancement?

  • Is enhancement desirable, and if so for whom?
  • What are the positive and negative consequences of enhancement for the individual and society?
  • Is enhancement another word for eugenics?
  • How is enhancement different from therapy?
  • How long should we live?

This thematic issue includes a number of papers that are drawn from a special panel titled “Bigger, Better, Best: Discussions on Human Enhancement” presented by the ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics (CESAGen), Lancaster University, at the 19th Annual Conference of the European Society for Philosophy of Health Care and Medicine in Barcelona (August 2005), as well as contributions from a wide range of leading scholars.

Editorials

PDF

Questions of Human Enhancement: An Editorial
Anthony Mark Cutter and Bert Gordijn

Comments

PDF

In Support of Human Enhancement
Sarah Chan and John Harris

Articles

PDF

Athlete or Guinea Pig? Sports and Enhancement Research
Nancy M. P. King and Richard Robeson

Discussions

 
 
 

ISSN: 1941-6008 ©1999-2008 The Berkeley Electronic Press™ All rights reserved.

To submit, subscribe, recommend this journal to your library, or sign up for email alerts, please visit: http://www.bepress.com/selt