Copyright (c) 2008 Berkeley Electronic Press All rights reserved. http://www.bepress.com/selt Recent documents in Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology en-us Wed, 07 May 2008 02:52:07 PDT 3600 http://www.bepress.com/selt/vol2/iss1/art13 http://www.bepress.com/selt/vol2/iss1/art13 Mon, 05 May 2008 08:46:45 PDT When we founded Studies in Ethics, Law and Technology we wondered if we might, like Icarus, be trying to fly too close to the sun. Had we set ourselves an impossible task in seeking to create a new community of interdisciplinary scholars under the umbrella of the words ethics, law and technology? Would expert scholars in biotechnologies, nanotechnologies, neurotechnologies, information technologies, weapons and security technologies, energy and fuel technologies, space based technologies, and/or new media and communication technologies all come together in one place? As we show in this editorial, the answer is yes. Anthony Mark Cutter http://www.bepress.com/selt/vol2/iss1/art12 http://www.bepress.com/selt/vol2/iss1/art12 Thu, 01 May 2008 13:36:22 PDT In this paper we examine an increasingly important form of global governance for the field of human embryonic stem cell science; the processes of standardisation. Technical standardisation is essential for any scientific field to develop and is applicable to all stages of knowledge production from the basic science to the market product. However in the case of stem cell science, the apparently neutral processes of standardisation are inextricably entwined with issues of cultural value, particularly around the ethical status of the embryo. This paper examines this tension in two domains of standardisation: basic research (governance of the science) and patenting (governance of the market). In formal governance terms, the two domains appear quite different. Basic research governance in stem cell science is characterised by a high degree of self-regulation by science, albeit with state sponsorship, whereas patenting falls within the legal aegis of international and state bodies. However, in pursuit of standardisation both domains are obliged to wrestle with the politics of the technical-ethical relationship and with the ways that relationship can be organised as a technology of governance. To that extent they form part of a common process of contestation and governance evolution. Catherine Waldby political science life sciences