Post-Strike Attribution--A Political & Scientific Dilemma

Robert McCreight, George Washington University
Stanley Supinski, Naval Postgraduate School

Abstract

Rapidly and positively identifying those responsible for carrying out a terrorist attack is essential for numerous reasons. Primarily, public demand to respond, whether diplomatically or militarily, will be intense, particularly in light of the devastating potential harm wrought by attacks using weapons of mass destruction. Quick identification of culprits and methods of operation may also be essential in preventing further assaults. Furthermore, recent history shows that terrorists who would carry out such an attack are less likely to identify themselves with the potential for immediate and accurate retribution. The need for a reliable, credible and internationally recognized system for post-strike attribution is essential as we continue to face WMD threats from terrorist adversaries. Terrorism is an end in itself, with the ultimate objective not receiving credit, but making headway against the enemy through mass casualties. Taking these factors into consideration, this essay advocates the establishment of a formal process and international standardization for post-strike attribution. Such a process will serve to bring key entities together prior to an event, establish protocols to facilitate attribution decisions, and serve as a terrorism deterrent.

Recommended Citation

McCreight, Robert and Supinski, Stanley (2007) "Post-Strike Attribution--A Political & Scientific Dilemma," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management: Vol. 4 : Iss. 2, Article 11.
Available at: http://www.bepress.com/jhsem/vol4/iss2/11

 
 
 
 

ISSN: 1547-7355 ©1999-2008 The Berkeley Electronic Press™ All rights reserved.

To submit, subscribe, recommend this journal to your library, or sign up for email alerts, please visit: http://www.bepress.com/jhsem