An Irresponsible Intrusion

Daniel H. Lowenstein, UCLA School of Law

Abstract

Professor Lowenstein argues that the en banc 9th Circuit was correct to reinstate the Oct. 7 recall election. Blocking the election would have been an irresponsible intrusion into a state’s political system and an incorrect reading of Bush v. Gore. In addition, delaying the election would have created chaos for candidates and election officials, perhaps creating greater distortions in the electoral process than if the recall proceeded as required under the California Constitution.

Recommended Citation

Lowenstein, Daniel H. (2003) "An Irresponsible Intrusion," The Forum: Vol. 1 : Iss. 4, Article 4.
DOI: 10.2202/1540-8884.1023
Available at: http://www.bepress.com/forum/vol1/iss4/art4

 
 
 
 

ISSN: 1540-8884 ©1999-2009 The Berkeley Electronic Press™ All rights reserved.

To submit, subscribe, recommend this journal to your library, or sign up for email alerts, please visit: http://www.bepress.com/forum