Constitutional Reform in California: The Surprising Divides

Mike Binder, Stanford University and University of California, San Diego
Tammy Frisby, Stanford University
Thad B. Kousser, Stanford University and University of California, San Diego

Abstract

In a survey of over 1,000 Californians, we found substantial divides in public opinion on issues related to constitutional change. Beyond partisan differences, there are racial and ethnic divides as well as unexpected differences between counties. Latinos and Asian-Americans (the growing "new" California electorate) are less dissatisfied with the initiative process, less eager to change California’s constitution to restrict direct democracy, and more likely to be unsure about their views on constitutional reform than whites and African-Americans (the "old" California electorate). This article also explores surprising geographic patterns in support and opposition to proposed reforms, such as the elimination of the two-thirds requirement for passing the state budget.

Recommended Citation

Binder, Mike; Frisby, Tammy; and Kousser, Thad B. (2010) "Constitutional Reform in California: The Surprising Divides," California Journal of Politics and Policy: Vol. 2 : Iss. 2, Article 5.
DOI: 10.2202/1944-4370.1070
Available at: http://www.bepress.com/cjpp/vol2/iss2/5

 
 
 
 

ISSN: 1944-4370 ©1999-2010 The Berkeley Electronic Press™ All rights reserved.

To submit, subscribe, recommend this journal to your library, or sign up for email alerts, please visit: http://www.bepress.com/cjpp