When Can Manipulations be Avoided in Two-Sided Matching Markets? -- Maximal Domain Results

Fuhito Kojima, Harvard University

A BEJTE Contributions article.

Abstract

In two-sided matching markets, stable mechanisms are vulnerable to various kinds of manipulations. This paper investigates conditions for the student-optimal stable mechanism (SOSM) and the college-optimal stable mechanism (COSM) to be immune to manipulations via capacities and pre-arranged matches. For SOSM, we find that strongly monotone preferences in populations and weakly maximin preferences are the maximal domains of college preferences that guarantee immunity to manipulations via capacities and pre-arranged matches, respectively. In contrast, COSM is susceptible to both manipulations whenever colleges have multiple positions.

Submitted: June 29, 2007 · Accepted: August 3, 2007 · Published: September 13, 2007

Recommended Citation

Kojima, Fuhito (2007) "When Can Manipulations be Avoided in Two-Sided Matching Markets? -- Maximal Domain Results," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 (Contributions), Article 32.
Available at: http://www.bepress.com/bejte/vol7/iss1/art32

 
 
 
 

ISSN: 1935-1704 ©1999-2008 The Berkeley Electronic Press™ All rights reserved.

To submit, subscribe, recommend this journal to your library, or sign up for email alerts, please visit: http://www.bepress.com/bejte