Indeterminacy, Stabilization Policy and Returns to Scale: A Re-Investigation

Nicholas C. S. Sim, Boston College

A BEJM Contributions article.

Abstract

This paper examines whether taxation is effective in eliminating sunspot fluctuations by considering two separate model economies by which indeterminacy occurs for empirically plausible specification of the model parameters. In the first model where production exhibits social increasing returns to scale and private constant returns to scale, I find that i) labor income tax alone, even if the tax schedule is flat, is effective; ii) taxes on labor and capital income would be more effective with increased progressivity; iii) at each average tax rate, labor income tax is more effective than capital income tax. However, in the second model where production exhibits social constant returns to scale and private decreasing returns to scale, I find that labor and capital income taxes at all progressivity levels are ineffective in removing sunspot fluctuations.

Submitted: August 14, 2004 · Accepted: November 18, 2004 · Published: May 4, 2005

Originally published in Contributions to Macroeconomics.

Recommended Citation

Sim, Nicholas C. S. (2005) "Indeterminacy, Stabilization Policy and Returns to Scale: A Re-Investigation," Contributions to Macroeconomics: Vol. 5 : Iss. 1, Article 3.
Available at: http://www.bepress.com/bejm/contributions/vol5/iss1/art3

 
 
 
 

ISSN: 1935-1690 ©1999-2008 The Berkeley Electronic Press™ All rights reserved.

To submit, subscribe, recommend this journal to your library, or sign up for email alerts, please visit: http://www.bepress.com/bejm