A Theory of Utilization Review

David Dranove, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University
Kathryn E. Spier, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University and NBER

A BEJEAP Contributions article.

Abstract

Through utilization review (UR), managed care organizations (MCOs) monitor and alter physician treatment decisions. We show that the value of UR depends on physician incentives. Not surprisingly, when physicians have incentives to significantly overtreat patients, UR can improve social welfare by eliminating unnecessary utilization. More surprisingly, UR can also improve welfare when physicians have incentives to significantly undertreat patients. In this case, UR filters out the least valuable cases, encouraging physicians to recommend more treatments. We also show that the effectiveness of UR depends on MCO precommitment to a treatment approval threshold. Ex ante optimal precommitment can make it appear that the MCO is inappropriately withholding care ex post.

Submitted: April 7, 2003 · Accepted: August 4, 2003 · Published: August 8, 2003

Originally published in Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy.

Recommended Citation

Dranove, David and Spier, Kathryn E. (2003) "A Theory of Utilization Review," Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy: Vol. 2 : Iss. 1, Article 9.
Available at: http://www.bepress.com/bejeap/contributions/vol2/iss1/art9

 
 
 
 

ISSN: 1935-1682 ©1999-2008 The Berkeley Electronic Press™ All rights reserved.

To submit, subscribe, recommend this journal to your library, or sign up for email alerts, please visit: http://www.bepress.com/bejeap