Abstract

This article analyzes the liability of the Philippine President for the tort of constitutional negligence in relation to the murders and forced disappearances of leftists, journalists, and other dissidents. It uses the international law doctrine of command responsibility as a form of attribution that may be used, by analogy, to hold the President accountable for a culture of impunity. The article describes the role of the President as the regulator of a human rights-conducive information ecology and argues that massive human rights violations meant to silence dissidents are a source of liability for which a class action suit is an available remedy. Finally, it looks at the concept of presidential immunity from suit from a comparative perspective and argues that the continued application of restrictive immunity rules established during the American colonial era is misplaced considering the universalist design of the present Philippine Constitution and developments in immunity jurisprudence in the United States.

Recommended Citation

Hilbay, Florin Ternal (2009) "The Philippine President as Tortfeasor-in-Chief: Establishing Civil Liability for Constitutional Negligence," Asian Journal of Comparative Law: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1, Article 1.
DOI: 10.2202/1932-0205.1155
Available at: http://www.bepress.com/asjcl/vol4/iss1/art1